Scout Research

Research translated into operational context.

Public-source research and analytical guidance organized around three questions: What do we know? What may it mean? What should claims professionals consider next?

OSINT & Background

Open-source research as lead development

Public records and public-facing information can develop addresses, affiliations, business connections, events, and investigative leads. Online indicators should be treated as sources to verify—not as proof.

Read: Follow the Work →
Pattern of Life

From isolated locations to useful patterns

Recurring lawful location and activity information can help refine field timing and investigative sequencing when the pattern is relevant, proportionate, and independently verified.

Use the surveillance referral tool →
AI & Claims

AI supports judgment—it does not replace it

Privacy, verification, human review, hallucination risk, and governance should shape every AI-assisted claims or investigation workflow.

Explore AI & Claims →
Analytical Standard

Separate collection from conclusion.

Useful research is traceable, relevant to the assignment, and explicit about uncertainty.

1CollectIdentify lawful, relevant sources and preserve the source context.
2VerifyTest material information against another source whenever practical.
3AnalyzeExplain what the information may support and what competing explanation remains possible.
4ApplyTie the research to the claim question or investigative next step—not to an unsupported label.
Research Principle

Public information becomes useful when it changes the quality of the next question.

Research should reduce uncertainty, develop a source, improve sequencing, or identify a specific fact that warrants further verification.

Explore investigation topics →