Start With the Question, Not the Service
Define the factual objective before choosing the investigative method.
Read Field Note →A practical interview-planning center for defining the objective, building the chronology, asking neutral questions, distinguishing direct knowledge from assumption, and turning answers into corroboration leads.
A recorded statement is most useful when the interviewer understands the claim question, the known chronology, the unresolved facts, and the sources that may later corroborate the account.
Avoid argumentative phrasing, loaded assumptions, and questions that signal the desired answer.
Break compound questions into smaller pieces so the answer can be understood and evaluated later.
Terms such as always, never, heavy, frequent, severe, or unable should be tied to examples when they matter.
Develop names, records, locations, communications, photos, and other lawful sources that may independently test the account.
Use the worksheet to define the interview objective, isolate fact gaps, organize the chronology, prepare question architecture, and document the most important corroboration leads.
Define the factual objective before choosing the investigative method.
Read Field Note →Use disputed facts and corroboration needs to structure interview sequencing.
Read Field Note →Confirm the report clearly distinguishes sources, findings, limitations, and unresolved questions.
Use review checklist →A professional interview preserves the difference between known fact, direct knowledge, estimate, hearsay, and unresolved conflict. Follow applicable policy, representation status, jurisdictional rules, recording requirements, and assignment authority.
Back to all topics →