Premium Fraud / Signal 06

X-mod evasion

Entity changes or reporting practices may warrant review of whether loss history and experience are being represented accurately.

← Premium Fraud Intelligence Download evidence checklist ↓

Questions to Answer

Define the representation before choosing the investigation.

What ownership and operational changes occurred, and when?

Is the new entity genuinely distinct or operationally continuous with the prior entity?

What loss history, payroll, employees, contracts and management carried forward?

Evidence to Develop

Build the factual chain from independent sources.

Ownership history

Corporate filings, ownership/management records and transaction documents where available.

Operational continuity

Locations, workforce, customers, equipment, websites, phone numbers and management.

Loss reporting chronology

Claims/loss history compared with policy/entity changes and reporting practices.

Specialist review

Experience-rating rules can be technical; involve underwriting, premium audit, legal or rating expertise as appropriate.

Next Step

Document what the evidence says - and what it does not.

Record the fact, source, date, relevance, and unresolved questions separately. Where the issue involves classification rules, rating, law, policy interpretation, or criminal referral standards, involve the appropriate specialists rather than asking the investigation to make the legal conclusion.

Continue the pathwayEvidence Development Checklist →Training modules →All premium fraud signals →